For the past years I have been teaching children with special needs in quite a few different settings. My degree says Early Childhood Teacher, but with all of my studying put together, I guess you could both call me a preschool teacher, prep teacher, special needs kinder / prep teacher, special needs carer, and a classroom assistant without being wrong! Besides my degree being… lets say inclusive, I also did a few extra courses 😉
Besides working with children with special needs being my job, it is also a great interest of mine. My aim is always the same, no matter the setting or the child – always to do the best thing for that little person.
However, one question always comes to my mind – what is the best thing, and who is it best for?
That question is probably one of the most difficult questions I have ever come across in my work, and I have had to re-think my answer again and again – for each child I have worked with. Sometimes one thing seems to be the right thing, and I start building everything around that, but then after a few weeks something might happen and suddenly the world looks different. It can be something the child does, something a colleague says, a thing I read somewhere, or something the parents comment on. It can be big or small – even the tiniest thing can change your opinion about something completely. And children develop and move (hopefully ahead!). Noting is ever static, not your students either.
However, the child’s development aside, as a teacher I still have to decide what to teach, what goals to set for each child, and what the best thing for that particular child is.
I have often had long and heated discussions with colleagues about this “best thing” or “right thing”. Even though we are both teachers and educated to take care of every single child in our class, we don’t always agree. In most cases I see that as a good thing, a strength. We contribute with different things, share ideas and open each other’s eyes. But I wonder, can you educate someone to do the right thing? Or in this case, can you educate someone to decide what the right thing is for someone else? For our students.
Adults, whether in the position as parent or teacher, are, and have always been, expected to make the decisions for the children in our care.
As parents we decided when it’s bedtime for our child, when it’s time for dinner, where we are going for the Sunday outing, how long our teenagers can stay out… we make all the decisions, but the decisions are all up for discussion, aren’t they? As soon as our children are born, they show their likes and dislikes first with tears and smiles, later actions and words, and they are able to quite clearly let us know what they think is best for them. As adults we are still responsible, even when we let them take part in choosing, but our children have the opportunity to voice their opinion.
As teachers we also decide what is best and right. Some things can sometimes be up for discussion with the students, but it is not the majority of things. As teachers we are expected to make the decisions. That’s what we are educated to do.
We have the law outlining a lot of the where’s, when’s and what’s, though even when we feel put in a small box, there’s still enough space for us to make choices. What materials will we use? Which texts do we think can teach this specific subject the best? And so on. But it is us as teachers who are expected to make those decisions as professionals.
So we, as teachers, are educated to make the final decisions as to what the best thing to do is. The law has decided the outline, the subjects, but there’re still so many choices to make and decisions to take when we try to teach the students the best things in the best ways. But what when that “best thing” we have to make a decision about is something so central in a student’s life that it can interfere with… everything?
When working with children with special needs I have often experienced that teaching is, even more than when working with other children, about so much more than “just” teaching different subjects. It’s about life skills. It’s about very central and important parts of that child’s life, not just for that year, but for always.
Children with special needs have… special needs. They do not always do like other children and develop and move ahead seemingly smoothly. They sometimes need a lot of help to move on. Help we, as teachers, give them. Every day we make choices about what the best thing is for that specific child to learn. Do we keep fighting hours every day with reading in year 8, so “Tom” can learn to read the second list of the Dolch Sight Words and can recognise the nouns and verbs in a sentence, or do we chose to set other goals for “Tom”? Do we spend two hours a day with math in year 10, so “Peter” can learn his 5 times tables and 3-digit addition, or do we chose to set other goals for “Peter”?
What’s the best thing to do, and who is it best for?
And who decides that?
At the moment I have volunteered to assist a kid with special needs in his year 5 class. He attends the local primary school and has done so since prep, even though as early as kindergarten his parents were advised that it would be best for him to attend a school for children with special needs instead. However, his parents made the choice for him to include him in a mainstream school, for good and for bad.
When I first started working with the boy in the beginning of the year his math skills were limited to adding together numbers under ten and his reading skills were minimal – he was still working on recognising the letters of the alphabet. When presented with work he would often refuse and grumble, and he was not used to listening to any messages not given directly to him. I’m sure you get the picture, he was behind and did not get much out of the general classroom teaching at all. Most of the time he would either work with an integration aide or sit in the classroom drawing, looking at books or daydreaming. The aide was only in a one or two lessons a day, and the teacher was more than busy with a few other children with milder special needs and behavioural issues in the class, so I guess you can imagine what this boy was doing most of the time.
However, the boy was quite happy. He liked coming to school and would smile and chat happily with anyone who would listen. His social skills were limited, but he had made a few friends that he would occasionally chat to or play with during recess, and he also liked joking with his classmates. He had settled down in the class and the other children knew him and helped him along.
But the question still comes to my mind: What’s the best thing for this boy, and who can decide that?
Is a mainstream school the right place for him to be? Even with as much help as the teacher and the aide can give him, he often spends a lot of time during school hours daydreaming or looking at picture books, because he is not able to follow the lesson (and the aide is only in the classroom one or two hours each day). Is that the best thing for him? Is the best thing for him to keep working with his addition, learning to subtract 1-digit numbers, struggling to read a few sight words, and sitting starring out of the window, or are there other options? What about his lack in social skills? What about the fact that whereas his classmates gets one year older each year, he seems to still be five years old inside? What about his inability to do little things for himself like tying his shoe laces? What are the most important things for him to learn? Is mainstream school really the best place for him to be? No? Or yes? Because despite his difficulties, he does seem happy at school.
The boy’s teacher and the principal at the school, as well as the assessment team, all agreed that the boy would be best off at a school for children with special needs. He was even accepted at a school for next year. But is it up to them to take that decision? What about the parents? They are not sure yet and so far have wanted him at a mainstream school. They want him included, and is that wrong?
What is best for this kid? And who gets to decide that?
Another boy I worked with years ago was autistic and didn’t talk, or in fact didn’t communicate much at all. He didn’t seem to want to talk and resisted learning to communicate in any way the best he could. He would turn away, he would cry, he would physically try to push you away. It was a “no”.
But could we let a 7-year-old child decide what was best for him? Would you agree if your 7-year-old son decided to have lollies for breakfast? Or stay up watching TV till midnight? I guess not.
But what about this boy, should we let him chose? Even when he was choosing to exclude us, everything, from his world. Or should we decide what was best for him?
Are we right when we say learning to communicate would be best for him? Or should we let him decide not to, because after all he has Autism and sees the world in a different way than we do? I have heard adults with Autism say that people should leave autistic kids alone and not try to change them or make them fit in, but would that be reason enough for us to let this child decide not to communicate?
When trying to determine what is right for this child, shouldn’t we mainly be thinking about his happiness? Would the child be happiest not communicating and in his own world, or could learning to communicate, though not willingly, bring him some more happiness?
I must admit that in his case I, as his primary carer at that point, decided that communicating would be better for him. Even though he was not interested at first.
However, a main reason for me deciding that my choice was the right one, was because of my view on his “no” to learning to communicate. I believed that it was much more a “no” to the unknown and a “no” to something he did not see a use for, than a “no” to communicating as such. He had no idea what words were for. He had no idea that he could talk to other people around him. In fact, often it seemed like he didn’t notice there were people around him at all.
So in his case, we, as adults, as his teachers and carers, decided what was best for him. Afterwards I can say we did the right thing, but only afterwards. When the boy learned that he could talk and use sign language to other people to tell them what he wanted, when he was thirsty, when he was hungry or needed the toilet, and when we could explain to him what was going on around him, a lot of his big temper tantrums disappeared. He might not have wanted to learn to communicate, and it was a long and at times hard process, but in the end it meant that he was able to understand the world he was born into a little better, and after that he settled down and became more at ease.
In this case we made the decision that this was best for the boy. Some might still disagree, though.
And anyway, the question is still there: when can we decide that we are the right ones to make decisions about what is best for someone else?
What is the best thing, who is it best for, and who gets to decide?